Pues parece ser que del presente mes de Abril a Mayo,Jupiter puede volver a alterar la actividad solar a valores mas bajos.Podria durar hasta Septiembre y los proximos meses podremos comprobar que hay de cierto en este tema y de confirmarse,si realmente es el que influye en el descenso de actividad.Alguien mas sabe algo de que se de esta posibilidad?Parece que el alineamiento de los gigantes gaseosos con el sol en 2010,coincidió con un descenso en la actividad.
suena a ciclo de Rieger, interesante saber si se cumple por allá por octubre de 2011 (el ciclo de Rieger)¿?
Que haya mas compresion abrupta en la magnetosfera de pasar de muchos días sin manchas a tener bastante actividad magnética con EMC´ s, suena a posible. Que estén detrás los planetas jovianos como posibles quitamanchas también; y algún planeta telúrico e incluso el pelotón donde vivimos que pudiera actuar en plan Fairy pues, venga también ¿?
Planetary Influences on Solar Activity
The Earth is not the only planet to display an influence on the formation of sunspots, though it is the most influential. Electron acceleration has been observed near Jupiter, not only along magnetic field lines, but across the regular magnetic field and toward the Sun. In fact, some of these electrons have been noted in the Earth's orbit. An astrophysicist's comment reveals what could be expected of a time-varying accelerator, "the source acts for some days and is then switched off."
This is also true of the other planets, and this is one of the reasons why we observe planetary periods in solar activity. It has been known for a long time that planetary positions that create angles of 0o, 90o, 180o, 270o, or two planets at 180o with the third at 90o affect short-wave radio reception, and radio signals due to increased solar activity. These angles are typical of the dynamics of electric and magnetic field interactions. From 1952 onwards, forecasting based on this understanding alone has been 80% effective.
The Earth in an angular relationship with any of the other planets, such as Venus-Earth configurations, influences the formation of sunspots. Configurations involving Mercury, Earth and Venus show some of the greatest effects. A 110-day cycle of angular acceleration between Venus, Earth and Jupiter is correlated to energetic x-ray bursts. The sources can be noted in the observation that the solar wind is associated with the local depletion of ion concentrations in the Venus and Earth ionospheres.
The four outer, largest planets (Jupiter, Saturn, Neptune and Uranus) are the most important for determining the position of the Sun, and the center of mass in the Solar System. The three closest (Mercury, Venus and Earth) are the most important for causing the jerk or change of acceleration of the Sun. These influences are the greatest gravitational effects, which are still far too weak to cause the observed shifts in solar activity.
The terms used to describe the angles between the planets are conjunction (0o), square (90o), and opposition (180o), all of which are noted in effects on solar activity. When Venus and Earth are in opposition there are 60% more sunspots than during conjunction. When the Earth, Venus and Jupiter are in conjunction, there are even more sunspots. A study covering a 300-year period disclosed that sunspots increase when Jupiter and Saturn are in conjunction, square and opposition. Uranus and Neptune are in square during maximums, and in conjunction or opposition during minimums. The positions of Mercury, Venus, Earth and Jupiter are correlated with solar proton events. Mercury's revolution around the Sun is also a solar cycle (87.976 days). When Venus, Earth and Jupiter are on the same side of the Sun with Mercury at closest approach (perihelion) the effect doubles. That is, Mercury's orbital period in sunspot data also depends on the phases of Venus, Earth and Jupiter. The conclusions from the data are clear: "There is a close link between various planetary alignments and the dates of sunspot maxima and minima."
The influence is a combination of electromagnetic fields in dynamic interaction that overcome the gravitational (tidal) forces. This is why studies that claim gravitational forces are responsible have been put into the skeptics corner, so to speak, and have somewhat discredited this whole area of study. Gravitational forces are far too weak to be responsible for the effects.
This electromagnetic long-range force is also why there are planetary periods in sunspots. What particularly illustrates this is that Pluto, the farthest (most of the time) and smallest of the planets, has a period that shows up in sunspot data. The influence cannot possibly be gravitational, as a scientist exclaims: "These planetary influences cannot be gravitational, but must be magnetic or electrical in character." Planetary positions have been used to predict solar flares, which is not explainable by gravitational effects. A scientist studying planetary positions and solar activity makes a comment that reflects the limitations of present perspectives: "There was as yet no understanding of why this should be."
The five outer planets' orbital (synodic) periods display close associations with sunspot periods, with the exception of Neptune. A scientist expresses concern over this enigma: "Note that, in spite of its size and great distance from the Sun, Pluto is included as one of the planets involved in a synodic period associated with a sunspot period. This is most surprising. Pluto is the most eccentric of the planets; Neptune, next to Venus, is the least eccentric. In fact, Neptune's orbit is almost exactly circular."
The reason Neptune's synodic period does not show up in sunspot periods is due to the way in which Neptune's magnetic field is offset in relation to the ecliptic plane and the IMF. It is not anywhere near the angular interactions that the other planets have with the IMF. This is also evident in lower radio emissions and an offset auroral zone that rotates with Neptune away from the Sun and the IMF.
Not only do planetary synodic periods correlate with solar activity, but also variations from orbital eccentricity are found in sunspot periods. Conjunctions of Jupiter and the center of mass of the Solar System (barycenter) have been used to predict energetic x-ray flares. Planetary effects on solar activity have been shown in numerous other studies. Many scientists acknowledge that the effect is not gravitational (i.e., tidal).
http://www.livingcosmos.com/solar.htmhttp://www.allanstime.com/News/PressReleases/sunspots.htmPlanetary Alignment and Magnetic Field Interaction
by
David W. Allan
www.allanstime.comMay 5, 2000
In regard to planetary alignment, magnetic field is more important than the distribution of the masses of the planets. For example, volcanic activity on the earth has been shown to be correlated with the magnetic field of Uranus. The planet Uranus has a very strong magnetic field and its spin axis, different than most of the other planets, is very near its orbital plane. So the changes in its magnetic field coupling to the earth and to the sun are much more dramatic.
The intensity of the magnetic field from planet to planet varies dramatically. For those having a strong magnetic field, such as the earth, and the large planets, a significant correlation has been shown between solar emissions and the magnetic fields of these planets. This magnetic field coupling to the sun and the earth changes over the course of the orbits of the planets and is dependant on the magnetic field orientation of each. The changes in the magnetic fields induce changes in the solar emissions from the sun, which in turn affect many things on the earth, such as communication systems, whether systems along with the probability of earthquakes, volcanic activity, and the intensity of our own magnetic field.
The research associated with the new unified field theory has revealed the above information. Associated with this theory is the extremely important discovery of diallel, gravitational-field lines. These lines go out radially from any object. A very evident manifestation of these diallel, gravitational- field lines for the earth is observed in how the energy in an atomic blast goes up a column – forming the mushroom cloud observed. Not only does the energy go up the column, but at the same time it goes down a column to the center of the earth – increasing core heating.
The advent of atomic bombs, atomic testing and of atomic energy has been the main contributor to global warming. The increased core heating of the earth has also triggered the increase in the occurrence of other natural phenomena – including unusual weather systems, increased probability of earthquakes, tsunamis, volcanoes, etc.
Our Creator has provided beautiful and inspiring balances in nature. When we through off those balances, there can be serious consequences. If we will work with these balances, rather than against them, there results a harmony between the Creator and the created.
http://www.allanstime.com/UnifiedFieldTheory/Planets_Alignment/index.htmlsaludos