Climategate 2

<1682> Wils:

[2007] What if climate change appears to be just mainly a multidecadal natural
fluctuation? They’ll kill us probably [...]

http://noconsensus.wordpress.com/2011/11/22/climategate-2-0/#more-12598

Y todos los sitios web relevantes. Se avecina tormenta en los proximos dias


los ficheros completos: http://motls.blogspot.com/2011/11/climategate-2011-foia.html
 
 

Está claro que tienen un topo bien gordo y con muy mala leche, ya que filtra siempre justo antes de una cumbre. Pero tambien está muy claro que esta gente manipula sin piedad, y oculta la verdad o miente por lo de siempre, por el bien común. Y si para ello tienen que cobrar, mejor que mejor. Es el mismo argumento que transforma un alcalde de pueblo cargado de buenas intenciones en un corrupto de buenas intenciones. Pero al final se convierten en solo corruptos.
Eso es lo que les ha pasado y ahora se destapa todo. Estos emails son muy escandalosos por lo que estoy leyendo. Por supuesto sacados de contexto aun son peores.
En fin , vamos a leer todo esto a ver que sale.

De momento me quedo con este:

<4443> Jones:

Basic problem is that all models are wrong – not got enough middle and low
level clouds.

http://www.desdeelexilio.com/2011/11/22/climategate-ii-nueva-filtracion-de-e-mails/

/// The IPCC Process ///

<0414> Coe:

Hence the AR4 Section 2.7.1.1.2 dismissal of the ACRIM composite to be
instrumental rather than solar in origin is a bit controversial. Similarly IPCC
in their discussion on solar RF since the Maunder Minimum are very dependent on
the paper by Wang et al (which I have been unable to access) in the decision to
reduce the solar RF significantly despite the many papers to the contrary in
the ISSI workshop. All this leaves the IPCC almost entirely dependent on CO2
for the explanation of current global temperatures as in Fig 2.23. since
methane CFCs and aerosols are not increasing.

 

/// The Medieval Warm Period ///
<5111> Pollack:
But it will be very difficult to make the MWP go away in Greenland.

Juas, que me da...

/// The Medieval Warm Period ///
<5096> Cook:
A growing body of evidence clearly shows [2008] that hydroclimatic variability
during the putative MWP (more appropriately and inclusively called the
“Medieval Climate Anomaly” or MCA period) was more regionally extreme (mainly
in terms of the frequency and duration of megadroughts) than anything we have
seen in the 20th century, except perhaps for the Sahel. So in certain ways the
MCA period may have been more climatically extreme than in modern times.

El Optimo Medieval los lleva de cabeza...

/// The Settled Science ///
<4470> Norwegian Meteorological Institute:
In Norway and Spitsbergen, it is possible to explain most of the warming after
the 1960s by changes in the atmospheric circulation. The warming prior to 1940
cannot be explained in this way.

 

/// The Medieval Warm Period ///
<5111> Pollack:
But it will be very difficult to make the MWP go away in Greenland.

Juas, que me da...

No tengo palabras...

Briffa se muestra muy esceptico con las reconstrucciones, este hombre al final me caerá bien 

<2009> Briffa:

I find myself in the strange position of being very skeptical of the quality of
all present reconstructions, yet sounding like a pro greenhouse zealot here!

<2440> Jones:

I’ve been told that IPCC is above national FOI Acts. One way to cover yourself
and all those working in AR5 would be to delete all emails at the end of the
process


Esto ya es de sinvergüenzas...No me extraña que quisieran borrar estos emails.

<2440> Jones:

I’ve been told that IPCC is above national FOI Acts. One way to cover yourself
and all those working in AR5 would be to delete all emails at the end of the
process


Esto ya es de sinvergüenzas...No me extraña que quisieran borrar estos emails.

Lo peor de todo es que esto no se difundirá. La prensa, alineada con el alarmismo oficial, no dirá nada, al menos en España, se hablará de contextos, de robos, de ilegalidad y se desviará la atención sobre lo importante, que es que un grupo de "científicos" está tratando de manejar a su antojo la "ciencia del clima", pasando por encima de todo, de sus compañeros que no siguen su corriente, e incluso de la ética científica.

<3115> Mann:  By the way, when is Tom C going to formally publish his roughly 1500 year
reconstruction??? It would help the cause to be able to refer to that
reconstruction as confirming Mann and Jones, etc.

<3940> Mann:  They will (see below) allow us to provide some discussion of the synthetic
example, referring to the J. Cimate paper (which should be finally accepted
upon submission of the revised final draft), so that should help the cause a
bit.

<0810> Mann: I gave up on Judith Curry a while ago. I don’t know what she think’s she’s
doing, but its not helping the cause






Se comportan y hablan como activistas...."ayudar a la causa"....

¿Dónde queda la ciencia?

Nada nuevo que no sepamos algunos.
Otro climagate que tampoco llegará a las masas.
Seguirán con sus cuotas de carbono, frenando el bienestar y jodiendo la marrana con sus "cientificos" que viven del CC.