Que tiene eso que ver con el tema de este hilo?
En cualquier caso,
Roger Pielke no parece muy impresionado con el trabajo de Muller:
(y hasta M Mann lo deja por los suelos)
It certainly appears that Richard Muller is an attention-getter, which he has succeeded at, but, unfortunately, he has demonstrated a remarkable lack of knowledge concerning the uncertainties in quantifying the actual long-term surface temperature trend, as well as a seriously incomplete knowledge of the climate system.
The proper way to complete a research study is provided in the Watts et al 2012 article. This article, a culmination of outstanding volunteer support under Anthony’s leadership, shows that Anthony Watts clearly understands the research process in climate science. As a result of his, and of and his colleagues, rigorous dedication to the scientific method, he has led a much more robust study than performed by Richard Muller in the BEST project.
Finally, on Andy Revkin’s well-respected and influential weblog Dot Earth, in a comment with respect to his post
‘Converted’ Skeptic: Humans Driving Recent Warming
he writes
Muller’s database will hold up as a powerful added tool for assessing land-side climate patterns, but his confidence level on the human element in recent climate change will not. I’d be happy to be proved wrong, mind you.
Andy’s assumption that “Muller’s database will hold up as a powerful added tool for assessing land-side climate patterns” is now shown as incorrect.
2004 Respuestas
669388 Vistas