Cita de: hrizzo en Miércoles 08 Abril 2015 10:39:12 AM
Evidentemente, esto no es ciencia sino ideología intolerante y totalitaria:

Another call to arrest climate "deniers"

Adam Weinstein, of the Gawker, has added his voice to the growing list of greens, who demand a brutal authoritarian response to the vexing problem of people who have a different opinion.

Weinstein bases his claim that man made climate change "kills a lot of people" on a WHO page, which estimates that 150,000 people per annum are dying because of climate related extreme weather and other problems, such as crop failure.

However, this claim simply doesn't stand up to scrutiny. Even the IPCC has failed to establish a link between CO2 and extreme weather. In addition, the rise in CO2 has so far been strongly beneficial for crop yields – satellites have detected a substantial greening of the planet, thanks largely to the fertilisation effect of the rise in atmospheric CO2.

Si esto sigue así pronto podremos hacer una quedada en el campo de concentración, esperemos que para reeducarnos.

Espaaaaaaña se acaaaaaaabaaaa buuuuhh

Cita de: giletoso en Jueves 09 Abril 2015 11:31:01 AM

Espaaaaaaña se acaaaaaaabaaaa buuuuhh

Que no Giletoso, que este tipo de "tontás alarmistas" van en el hilo "¡Hay que joderse con el cambio climático!". 

En "Sala de prensa" deberían ir noticias serias sobre el C.C., aunque comprendo que el problema gordo es que no las hay, o mejor dicho, no interesa publicarlas porque no venden... 

The Church Of Climate Scientology: How Climate Science Became A Religion

How do we protect ourselves against such abuses of science? By knowing the one key difference between real scientists and science abusers. Science abusers treat science as an infallible authority to be blindly obeyed by the public. Real scientists treat science as a method to be carefully explained to the public.
By this standard, today's vaunted "climate science consensus"—that it's been scientifically proven that we need to dismantle the fossil fuel industry, the economic engine of the world—is more Scientology than science.

Climate Pacemaker: The AMOC

We hear a lot about CO2 as climate's "control knob, but about the oceans' pacemaker, AMOC (Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation)? Not so much.
In the Water World post, I referenced the match between SSTs (sea surface temperatures) as recorded in HadISSAT and the IPO, an index of SSTs in the Eastern Pacific: North, Central and South. This is a brief discussion of the Atlantic role in shaping climate patterns, especially in Europe and North America.

http://internacional.elpais.com/internacional/2015/04/17/actualidad/1429285035_361650.html

Memo to our cousins at the American Physical Society: time to embrace reality

Climate change is now a political issue. It is not the business of the American Physical Society to take sides and make what amount to partisan political statements, particularly when the activists promoting the APS' revised "statement on climate change" have taken care to restrict members to one comment each on the draft.
... So to science. There is now a statable case that undue concern about our effect on the climate is misplaced. The original wild predictions on which that concern was built have proven much exaggerated. Even the IPCC has implicitly accepted this fact by substituting what it ambitiously describes as its "expert judgment" for the meaningless output of the computer models on which the excessive predictions of doom that originally fueled the climate scare were based.
... It is not clear whether natural or anthropogenic forcings currently dominate. Of the abstracts of 11,944 climate-related papers published in the reviewed journals over the 21 years 1991-2011, only 41 (0.3%) were found to have stated explicitly that most warming since 1950 was manmade (Legates et al., 2013). This is not a "97% consensus" and we express our dismay at the attempts in some scientific journals and in much of the news media to suggest near-unanimity on a scientific question that very much remains open. 

Ayer fue "Earth Day".  Aqui hay una lista de las apocalipticas predicciones que se hicieron el primer Earth Day en 1970, incluyendo la inminente era glacial que se avecinaba, por la cual habia que cubrir los polos con hollin... 

http://wattsupwiththat.com/2015/04/22/failed-earth-day-predictions/

Top scientists start to examine fiddled global warming figures

Last month, we are told, the world enjoyed "its hottest March since records began in 1880". This year, according to "US government scientists", already bids to outrank 2014 as "the hottest ever". The figures from the US National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) were based, like all the other three official surface temperature records on which the world's scientists and politicians rely, on data compiled from a network of weather stations by NOAA's Global Historical Climate Network (GHCN).


Versión 2014 de GISS:



Datos originales, sin ajustar:

Influencia del volcán Calmuco en el clima

... No todos las erupciones por otra parte son iguales. Existe una escala de explosividad de cero a ocho, que es una medida de la cantidad de ceniza y material que produce un volcán. Antes del Calmuco, la erupción importante mas significativa fue la del Monte Pinatubo en Filipinas, en junio de 1991. Fue clasificada como seis en dicha escala, mientras que la primera del Calmuco ha estado entre 4 y 5.

Mas noticias apocalipticas.

Suponiendo por un momento que el CGA sea cierto, no habria un sinnumero de especies que se beneficiarian enormemente de un ascenso de las temperaturas?

http://elpais.com/elpais/2015/04/30/ciencia/1430404361_523598.html

Mi comentario al artículo que mencionas, bw1339, refiere al Eemiense (o Riss-Würm), cuando todas las especies actuales sobrevivieron y medraron, incluyendo la nuestra.

No sé si lo publicarán.